Newsfiend
12-18-2009, 06:11 PM
chordling wrote:
This question about these evolving weapons has probably already been argued about elsewhere, but why the heck is the final result for some classes around MMM ratio weapons, when other classes get nearly tower ratio weapons?
When I saw 60/19 monk weapon I started getting my hopes up about the bard weapon.. and its 54/21 ???
A monk with tier3 weapons like corpse hook and krossmaul would see an upgrade with this.
A bard with my tier3 weapons like Tyranont charged spike and Ache would see a MAJOR downgrade and would not even consider wearing this weapon ever.
Why the huge difference?
Basically the monk weapon ends up a tier higher than it should have. It's getting changed to match the rest of the items next time we patch. The secondary slot thing for non-dual wield classes has also been removed.
More... (http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/posts/list.m?topic_id=159314&post_id=2368442#2368442)
This question about these evolving weapons has probably already been argued about elsewhere, but why the heck is the final result for some classes around MMM ratio weapons, when other classes get nearly tower ratio weapons?
When I saw 60/19 monk weapon I started getting my hopes up about the bard weapon.. and its 54/21 ???
A monk with tier3 weapons like corpse hook and krossmaul would see an upgrade with this.
A bard with my tier3 weapons like Tyranont charged spike and Ache would see a MAJOR downgrade and would not even consider wearing this weapon ever.
Why the huge difference?
Basically the monk weapon ends up a tier higher than it should have. It's getting changed to match the rest of the items next time we patch. The secondary slot thing for non-dual wield classes has also been removed.
More... (http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/posts/list.m?topic_id=159314&post_id=2368442#2368442)