Newsfiend
12-18-2009, 06:11 PM
beryon wrote:
Can we please have secondary added anyway? It should be the players' choice if they want to keep the weapon in primary because it looks a bit odd in secondary. Forcing a restriction like this on one class is unfair.
While I agree with the sentiment, and we've actually tried doing that in the past, the number of CS issues generated by "backwards" items is surprisingly high, and adversely affects the resolution of actual problems. It was eye-opening to me as well.
As for the suggestion of an ornamentation, we could use an ornamentation to limit a pri/sec item to sec only, but we can't use one to change a pri only to sec only.
More... (http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/posts/list.m?topic_id=159314&post_id=2368450#2368450)
Can we please have secondary added anyway? It should be the players' choice if they want to keep the weapon in primary because it looks a bit odd in secondary. Forcing a restriction like this on one class is unfair.
While I agree with the sentiment, and we've actually tried doing that in the past, the number of CS issues generated by "backwards" items is surprisingly high, and adversely affects the resolution of actual problems. It was eye-opening to me as well.
As for the suggestion of an ornamentation, we could use an ornamentation to limit a pri/sec item to sec only, but we can't use one to change a pri only to sec only.
More... (http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/posts/list.m?topic_id=159314&post_id=2368450#2368450)